![]() The Genesis 1 Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
(Somebody Understands Quantum Mechanics)
When God created the Heavens and the Earth, He created a block
universe. During this process, when He sees someone doing the
double slit experiment, when there is a particle detector operating
behind the slits, He looks at the quantum mechanics equation, sees
that the result is to put a particle-like pattern on the screen so
that's what He does. And when there is no particle detector
operating, God checks the quantum mechanics equation and finds out
there should be a wave-like pattern on the screen so He makes a
wave-like pattern on the screen. I think I must be the first person
to propose this interpretation, so I get to name it. I'll call it
the Genesis 1 Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
I could just end this essay right here. People who know about
quantum mechanics already understand the interpretation. And, of
course, they will OVERWHELMINGLY not like it. Bringing God into
physics is politically incorrect. The whole universe must be
explained using only laws of physics that work automatically without
any intelligent intervention. So, to avoid God, they made up all
sorts of mystical, magical interpretations of quantum mechanics.
The problem of interpreting quantum mechanics is they all begin with
the outlook on the world called presentism. With presentism,
only the present exists and there are all these particles moving
around through the universe. The past is gone and there is no
future yet. In the double slit experiment you send particles to a
screen that has two vertical slits (openings) in it that will let
the particles though. Usually the particle is a particle of light,
a photon, but the experiment works with larger things too. A
pattern of light and dark will show up on another screen that is
behind the screen with the double slits. When you don't have a
particle detector behind the slits, you get a wave-like pattern on
the screen making people think light is a wave. You get a wave-like
pattern supposedly because the particle going
through the slits goes through both slits at the same time, as if
the particle is really a wave. (So they say.) Again, the wave-like
pattern on the screen is what you would expect if light is a
wave, like a water wave.
If you do the experiment again, but with one of the two slits closed,
you get a pattern on the screen you would get if the particle was
just a particle and not a wave.
If you now operate a particle detector behind the screen with both
slits open again, you get a pattern on the screen that you would get
if light is a particle. It's as if the particle of light really is
a particle and it went through just one of the slits. Now thinking
about this is terrible. It's AS IF the particle knew that it was
going to find a particle detector in it's future so it went through
one slit instead of both. How can that be? It should not know what
it is going to run into on the other side. The future isn't ``out
there" yet, right? So how could the particle's future influence the
particle's present? Youtube is loaded with videos about the double
slit experiment, here is one of them:
Double Slit Experiment explained! by Jim Al-Khalili
This particular video includes one extra step. When the particle
detector is turned on you get the particle-like pattern on the
screen. When it is simply turned off (not working!) you get the
wave-like pattern on the screen.
And, so, now, if you insist on believing in presentism, you have to
make up all sorts of weird interpretations of what is going on. Of
course, with the Genesis 1 Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics that
relies on God creating a block universe, He takes into account what
happens to the particle during its whole lifetime and builds the
world according to the equations that are His ``laws" of physics.
In recent times there is the relational blockworld (RBW)
interpretation of quantum mechanics where the developers of the
interpretation say basically the same thing
1.
They say the future has to be taken into account when doing physics.
But they're not interested in bringing God into it because that is
politically incorrect. Instead, they basically say, in effect,
not literally: "To do physics correctly, to get the right
answer, you need to adopt the viewpoint of the block universe where
the past, present, and future are all equally real. But thinking
about how the universe got to be the way it is, is something we're
going to ignore."
On a philosophical note, what happens to particles in the double
slit experiment also shows up in the real world with people. In the
double slit experiment, where the particle ends up is determined by
everything that happens to it during its entire lifetime. The same
thing happens to people in the real world. What happens in the
future affects a person's past and present. Everyone's life is
arranged ahead of time to fit together perfectly with everything
else that happens to them throughout their entire lifetime.
1
Unification per the
Relational Blockworld W.M. Stuckey and Michael Silberstein.
They consider the two slit experiment starting on page 27. Also,
earlier in this paper they say that quantum mechanics is coming from
the relativity of simultaneity. If anyone knows why everyone is
ignoring what seems to be a stunning result, please let me know.
![]() |